Berg Lawsuit Takes Strange Twist

In what appears to be a strange twist, Phil Berg’s injunction, which asked the SCOTUS to stay the Electoral College Vote on December 15 or stay the counting of the votes on January 8, has been scheduled for a SCOTUS conference on Friday, January 16. This is in addition to the SCOTUS conference scheduled for January 9, which will take up Berg’s petition for certiorari.

 

It is difficult to determine what is going on in the minds of the Justices.  Berg thinks that his certiorari petition may have been scheduled for conference after the Electoral College votes are actually counted because it is not until after the votes are counted that Obama is officially the President-Elect. 

 

There are several theories flying around concerning the January 16 injunction conference.  Jeff Berg at America ’s Right thinks that allowing a moot proceeding to be heard could be a tactic to prevent other such proceedings to come before the court. 

 

On the other hand, Tom Waite, writing at Berg’s website, believes that the SCOTUS has very cleverly scheduled the petition for certiorari after the counting of the Electoral College votes because Berg will have standing at that point. Waite feels that the scheduling of the second conference on January 16 is a very clever way of boxing Obama in.  He likens it to a game of chess.  If Obama does not produce the requested documentation on the 9^th, then the SCOTUS can retroactively cancel the results of theElectoral College.

 

To add further intrigue to the situation, Obama is vacationing in Hawaii , where his friend and advisor, Valerie Jarrett, will be meeting with the governor.  And Rahm Emanuel, his chief of staff, is said to be vacationing in Africa with no word on where. Would it be a surprise to find him in Kenya , where Obama’s family has been silenced and where there very possibly is another birth certificate?

 

This is reading like a soap opera folks.  Pass the popcorn, please.

 

http://www.americasright.com/

http://www.obamacrimes.com/

Comments

[Uncle Fester]

Boy, you people are just nuts. When the Supreme Court sets a petition or motion for discussion in conference, it's not an invitation for the respondent to offer any evidence or to submit anything. Obama can't, even if he wanted to, submit anything to the court for the January 9th conference. All the court has done is add these filings to the lists of matters already scheduled for discussion in their private internal meetings on 1/9 ans 1/16. They've formally rejected every petition filed to date on the subject. There's absolutely no reason to think that anything will change now.

[Citizen Cane]

This game was over by a checkmate long ago - the opponent has left the table and you’re not even aware of that?

No popcorn for you.

[Patriot 7]

Nuts? That's how people who are concerned about rule of law in this country are dismissed? How tragic. The facts of the Berg case as well as others that have been brought seeking evidence of Obama's citizenship are valid and necessary. It's too bad that anyone would be content with means-justifies-ends tactics in winning an election or in seating a potential non-citizen to the presidency. Though there may be no other parallels drawn between them, Hitler was admitted as a German citizen for the sake of his election through covert, illegal papering over of his Austrian citizenship.

No one should be allowed to circumvent the law of the land and anyone who believes a blind eye should be turned in this case supports lawlessness and Obama's supposed entitlement to stand above the law.

[Puma for Llife]

An Open Letter to the Supreme Court Justices
of
The United States of America
.

by J.W. Schultz
.
Sirs, Madam:
.
I have the utmost respect for the Supreme Court but I have no respect for the currently sitting justices. I want you to know this up front so there will be no mistake as to what follows.
.
I will not enumerate all of the constitutional questions that have come up before the Supreme Court in the last hundred years that the politically motivated justices have refused to address – you know better than I how many and the nature of those questions that were refused to be addressed.
.
I will, however, present to you one question that I believe needs to be addressed immediately if our constitution is to continue to be the basis of the law of our land and, therefore, a continuing and binding contract between We The People and those leaders who are supposed to represent and govern us.
.
The question I present to you is not one with which you are unfamiliar: it deals specifically with the qualifications of a man who wants to be the President of the United States of America. You are well aware of whom that man is; you also know which particular qualification I am referring to: Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility, specifically his birth status.
.
You also know full well that if you do not address this issue, Barack Hussein Obama will, in all likelihood, take the office of President under false pretenses – he will become a constitutionally illegal usurper of the office of President of the United States of America.
.
What is just as important is the fact that if you do not address this issue, the blame for an impending Constitutional Crisis will fall on your shoulders. Is this what you want?
.
I cannot bring myself to believe that you, currently sitting Supreme Court Justices, actually think this matter will go away merely by hiding from it. Nay, it will not go away – it will grow in direct proportion to your refusal to address it. Is this what you want?
.
The important thing is, YOU JUSTICES SHOULD DAMN WELL KNOW THE PRICE THAT WAS PAID FOR THIS SACRED PIECE OF PARCHMENT KNOWN AS THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
.
I am an ordinary citizen of this country. I love my country: I have participated in a war to defend this country. I love what our constitution means when it promises, ‘...life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’ I want more than anything in this world for this country to remain a Constitutional Republic for the sake of my children, my grandchildren and my great-grandchildren. There is no other country such as ours: nowhere does any other country in the world possess a constitution such as ours. Our constitution promises freedom, opportunity and equality to its citizens. Our country has, historically, been the least oppressive of its citizens of all the other countries in the modern world. Why on earth would you want to throw that away for some small political favor?
.
Please get back to doing the people’s business. Refuse to be the pet lackeys of some partisan political or ideological group: be impartial; use the tools of honor and integrity when administering opinions in an official capacity. For the sake of our once great country and your own posterity, do the right thing: address this most important constitutional issue while We The People still have a contract between ourselves and those we elect (legally) to govern us.
.
You cannot drill a hole in our end of the ship of state and expect to stay afloat yourselves.
.
Joseph W. Schultz
Natural born citizen of
The United States of America