Update on Eligibility Lawsuits: Lightfoot vs. Bowen Emergency Stay Denied; Taitz to File Writ of Certiorari; Indiana Case ( Ankeny vs. Daniels); and More

Effective Resistance to usurpers is possible only provided the citizens understand their rights and are disposed to defend them (The Federalist, No. 28, Alexander Hamilton)

 

Another Monday, another SCOTUS denial of an eligibility lawsuit.  Today, Orly Taitz’s petition for emergency stay, Lightfoot vs Bowen, was denied.  Not to be deterred, Taitz will be filing a Writ of Certiorari within the next few days.

 

In addition, Taitz is filing a motion with Chief Justice Roberts regarding the private meeting between the Usurper with eight of the nine Justices prior to the hearing of her case (Justice Samuel Alito did not attend the private meeting). Taitz is demanding that the records of that meeting be made public.

 

Finally, Taitz is demanding from Roberts an investigation into the deletion of the public docket information on Lightfoot vs Bowen upon the reopening of the court on January 21.  Apparently, a lot of people who are following her case called the court to find out what was going on and, surprise, got no explanation. Eventually, her case information was re-posted, but Taitz wants to know what is going on at the Supreme Court.

 

Taitz is sending a copy of her letter to both the Congressional and Senatorial Judicial committees asking for a full investigation and hearing, as well as to the FBI and US attorney's offices.

 

I like Taitz.  She’s feisty and doesn’t take no for an answer.  She’s willing to push the envelope and pursue all leads, call anyone and everyone on the carpet, and demand accountability and transparency.  To some people this may come across as wild and crazy, but then, Samuel Adams and Tom Paine were pretty wild and crazy also and that’s what it took to start a country; maybe that’s what it will take to preserve the country they fought for and its constitution.

 

You can read more at her website:

http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/01/urgent-need-affidavits-for-motion-to.html

 

In Indiana we have a new case brewing.  Steve Ankeny and Bill Kruse are plaintiffs in a case they have filed against Governor Mitch Daniels and the Democratic and Republican National Committees.  Their claim is that the defendants did not uphold the Constitution when they certified the election results.  The case was originally submitted on December 9, but the defendants have asked for more time to respond and now have until January 31, 2009.

 

In Indiana these things seem to be taken seriously.  That’s refreshing.  Apparently, the judge who will be hearing the case stated that although he could not talk about the specifics of the lawsuit, this is a very free country and the parties will be given the full consideration and respect of the court.  The Governor said “no comment.”

 

You can find more information on the case here: http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=3007

 

Another new case was filed in New Jersey : Kerchner et al vs. Obama et al.  The complaint was filed by Mario Apuzzo, Esq. on January 20, 2009 and amended on January 21, 2009 to include an Emergency Injunction, Declaratory Relief, Mandamus, and Petition for Quo Warranto.  The defendants in this case are: Barack Hussein Obama II, United States of America , United States Congress, United States Senate, United States House of Representatives, Richard B. Cheney, and Nancy Pelosi.

 

This case is asking whether the Usurper is an Article II “natural born” citizen and thus eligible to be POTUS.  As of January 23, the defendants had not yet been served.  Apuzzo says he will appreciate whatever comments anyone has on the procedural posture and underlying merits of this lawsuit. 

 

His website is:

http://countusout.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/new-case-filed-kerchner-et-al-v-obama-et-al/

 

There are many other cases across the nation, last I heard around thirty more.  The most recent polls show that between 55%-60% of Americans now believe that the question of the Usurpers eligibility for POTUS has some merit.  And that’s without any mainstream media coverage at all.  Wonder how most people know about it?  Maybe they all read the Globe, which has another hot cover story about the Usurper.  Before you laugh, remember it was the Enquirer that broke the John Edwards affair.  Right now, it’s read the Globe and the Enquirer for coverage of the hoax of the century – and pass it on to your kool aid drinking friends.

 

Comments

[Ted]

With the mounting job casualties, here's hoping SCOTUS either finds someone, somewhere, has standing to require BHO's birth certificate or fixes attention on a criminal indictment before he wins his War on Prosperity.