Raw Data:
GIBSON: Governor, let me start by asking
you a question that I asked John McCain about you. And it is really the
central question. Can you look the country in the eye and say, I have
the experience, and I have the ability to be not just vice president,
but perhaps president of the United States of America?
PALIN: I do, Charlie, and on January 20th,
when John McCain and I are sworn in, if we are so privileged to be
elected to serve this country, we’ll be ready. I’m ready.
GIBSON: When McCain asked you to take the spot on the ticket, for a moment, did you think no?
PALIN: I did not. I thought yes, right off
the bat. When he offered me the position, as his running mate, the
first thing I said to him was, if you really think that I can help the
ticket, if you really think that I can help this country, absolutely, I
want to do this with you.
GIBSON: And you didn’t say to yourself, am I experienced enough? Am I ready?
PALIN: I didn’t hesitate, no.
GIBSON: Doesn’t that take some hubris?
PALIN: I answered him yes because I have
the confidence in that readiness. And knowing that you can’t blink. You
have to be wired in a way of being so committed to the mission, the
mission that we’re on, reform of this country, and victory in the war.
You can’t blink. So, I didn’t blink then, when asked to run as his
running mate.
GIBSON: But this is not just reforming a
government. This is also running a government on the huge international
stage, in a very dangerous world. When I asked John McCain about your
national security credentials, he cited the fact you have command of
the Alaskan National Guard and Alaska is close to Russia. Are those
sufficient credentials?
PALIN: But it is about reform of
government. And it’s about putting government back on the side of the
people. And that has much to do with foreign policy and national
security issues.
Let me speak specifically about a
credential that I do bring to this table, Charlie. And that’s with the
energy independence that I’ve been working on for these years, as the
governor of this state, that produces nearly 20 percent of the U.S.
domestic supply of energy. That I worked on as chairman of the Alaska
Oil and Gas Conversation Commission, overseeing the oil and gas
developments in our state, to produce more for the United States.
GIBSON: National security is a whole lot more than energy.
PALIN: It is. But - but I want you to not
lose sight of the fact that energy is a foundation of national
security. It’s that important. It’s that significant.
GIBSON: Did you ever travel outside the country prior to your trip to Kuwait and Germany last year?
PALIN: Canada. Mexico. And then, that trip
that was a trip of a lifetime, to visit troops in Kuwait and stop and
visit injured soldiers in Germany. That was a trip of a lifetime. And
it changed my life.
GIBSON: Have you ever met a foreign head of state?
PALIN: I have not. And I think if you go
back in history and if you ask that question of many vice presidents,
they may have the same answer that I just gave you. But Charlie, again,
we got to remember what the desire is in this nation, at this time. It
is for no more politics as usual. And somebody’s big, fat resume maybe
that shows decades and decades in that Washington establishment, where,
yeah, they’ve had opportunity to meet heads of state.
GIBSON: Let me ask you about some specific national security situations.
PALIN: Sure.
GIBSON: Let’s start, because we are near
Russia. Let’s start with Russia and Georgia. The administration has
said, we’ve got to maintain the territorial integrity of Georgia. Do
you believe the United States should try to restore Georgian
sovereignty over South Ossetia and Abkhazia?
PALIN: First off, we’re going to continue
good relations with Saakashvili there. I was able to speak the other
day and giving my commitment, as John McCain’s running mate, that we
will be committed to Georgia. And we have to keep an eye on Russia. For
Russia to have asserted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller
democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable. And we have to keep …
GIBSON: You believe unprovoked?
PALIN: I do believe unprovoked. And we have to keep our eyes on Russia. Under the leadership there.
GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions particularly in the last couple weeks does the proximity of the state give you?
PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors. And you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska.
GIBSON: You favor putting Georgia and Ukraine into NATO?
PALIN: Ukraine definitely yes. Yes. And Georgia. Putin thinks otherwise, obviously he thinks otherwise.
GIBSON: Under the NATO treaty, wouldn’t we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?
PALIN: Perhaps so. That is the agreement.
When you are a NATO ally, is, if another country is attacked, you are
going to be expected to be called upon and help.
GIBSON: Let me turn to Iran. Do you consider a nuclear Iran to be an existential threat to Israel?
PALIN: I believe that under the leadership
of Ahmadinejad, nuclear weapons in the hands of his government are
extremely dangerous to everyone on this globe, yes.
GIBSON: So, what should we do about a nuclear Iran?
PALIN: We have got to make sure these
weapons of mass destruction, that nuclear weapons are not given to
those hands of Ahmadinejad, not that he would use them, but that he
would allow terrorists to be able to use them. So we have got to put
the pressure on Iran.
GIBSON: What if Israel decided it felt threatened and need to take out the Iranian nuclear facilities?
PALIN: Well, first, we are friends of
Israel, and I don’t think that we should second guess the measures that
Israel has to take to defend themselves, and for their security.
GIBSON: So if we didn’t second guess it
and if they decided they needed to do it, because Iran was an
existential threat, we would be cooperative or agree with that?
PALIN: I don’t think we can second guess what Israel has to do to secure its nation.
GIBSON: So if it felt necessary, if it
felt the need to defend itself by taking out Iranian nuclear
facilities, that would be all right?
PALIN: We cannot second guess the steps that Israel has to take to defend itself.
GIBSON: We talk on the anniversary of 9/11. Why do you think those hijackers attacked? Why did they want to hurt us?
PALIN: You know, there is a very small
percentage of Islamic believers who are extreme, and they are violent,
and they do not believe in American ideals. And they attacked us. And
now we are at a point, here, seven years later, on the anniversary, in
this post- 9/11 world, where we are able to commit to never again. The
only option for them is to become a suicide bomber, to get caught up in
this evil, in this terror. They need to be provided the hope that all
Americans have, instilled in us, because we’re a democratic and we are
a free, we’re a free-thinking society.
GIBSON: Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?
PALIN: In what respect, Charlie?
GIBSON: The Bush — well, what do you interpret it to be?
PALIN: His world view?
GIBSON: No, the Bush doctrine, annunciated September 2002, before the Iraq War.
PALIN: I believe that what President Bush
has attempted to do is rid this world of Islamic extremism, terrorists
who are hell-bent on destroying our nation. There have been blunders
along the way, though. There have been mistakes made, and with new
leadership, and that’s the beauty of American elections, of course, and
democracy, is with new leadership comes opportunity to do things better.
GIBSON: The Bush doctrine as I understand
it is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense, that we have
the right to a preemptive strike against any country that we think is
going to attack us. Do you agree with us?
PALIN: Charlie, if there is legitimate and
enough intelligent and legitimate evidence that tells us that a strike
is imminent against American people, we have every right to defend our
country.
GIBSON: Do we have the right to be making
cross-border attacks into Pakistan, from Afghanistan, with or without
the approval of the Pakistani government?
PALIN: As for our right to invade, we’re
going to work with these countries, building new relationships, working
with existing allies, but forging new also, in order to, Charlie, get
to a point in this world, where war is not going to be a first option.
In fact, war has got to be and military strike a last option.
GIBSON: But governor, I am asking you, do
we have the right, in your mind, to go across the border, with or
without the approval of the Pakistani government?
PALIN: In order to stop Islamic
extremists, those terrorists who would seek to destroy America, and our
allies, we must do whatever it takes, and we must not blink, Charlie.
In making those tough decisions of where we go, and even who we target.
GIBSON: And let me finish with this. I got
lost in a blizzard of words there. Is that a yes, that you think we
have the right to go across the border, with or without the approval of
the Pakistani government? To go after terrorists who are in the
Waziristan area?
PALIN: I believe that America has to
exercise all options in order to stop the terrorists who are hell-bent
on destroying America, and our allies. We have got to have all options
out there on the table.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
GIBSON: You said recently in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.”
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
PALIN: Pray for our military men and women
who are striving to do what is right, also for this country, that our
leaders, our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is
from God.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
GIBSON: Are we fighting a Holy War?
PALIN: That’s a repeat of Abraham
Lincoln’s words, when he said, first he suggested, never presume to
know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will
or to speak god’s words, but what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s
a repeat in my comments, was, let us not pray that God is on our side,
in a war, or any other time. But let us pray that we are on God’s side.
That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie.
Today is the day that I send my first
born, my son, my teenage son, oversees with his Stryker brigade. Four
thousand other wonderful American men and women to fight for our
country, to fight for our freedoms.
GIBSON: But you went on and said, “There is a plan, and it is God’s plan.”
PALIN: I believe that there is a plan for
this world, and that plan, for this world, is for good. I believe that
there is great hope and great potential for every country, to be able
to live and be protected within inalienable rights, that I believe are
God-given, Charlie. And I believe those are the rights to life, liberty
and the pursuit of happiness.
That in my worldview is the grand plan.
GIBSON: Then, are you sending your son on a task from God?
PALIN: I don’t know if the task is from
God, Charlie. What I know is that my son has made a decision. I am so
proud of his independent and strong decision. What he decided to do, in
serving for the right reasons in serving something greater than self,
and not choosing a real easy path, where he could be more comfortable
and certainly safer.
Recent Comments